Many people are still in the habit of using ACF for content that should be handled by Gutenberg. This is "convenient" but very expensive.
Why is ACF not recommended for storing primary content?
ACF stores all data in the postmeta table, resulting in a large number of queries, which affects performance
Lack of clarity in data structure, which is not conducive to future maintenance
SEO plugins have difficulty recognizing content in the ACF, which is not conducive to optimization
even though
Gutenberg currently lacks some high-level features (such as conditional logic, dynamic display), but through some plug-in extensions (such as Advanced Block Controls, Blockera , etc.) has been able to meet most of the page construction needs. And Gutenberg uses the HTML + CSS concept , for those who know the front-end , more efficient .
- newest
- hottest
See only the author.